The Claude Master Prompt: Make Claude Rewrite Your Prompts Before It Answers
One paste makes Claude turn your rough request into the prompt it would want to receive, ask for the details you forgot, and wait for your go. The master prompt, how to answer its questions in thirty seconds, three worked examples, the version that runs on its own in a Project, and the fix for when it skips ahead.
Save it, print it, read it offline. It's yours.
You’ve seen the prompt formulas. Role, task, context, format, examples, tone. They work, and almost nobody remembers them at 9pm when they need an email written. Here’s the shortcut I use instead: I don’t write good prompts anymore. I write rough ones, and I make Claude turn them into good ones before it does anything. It’s one paste, it takes thirty seconds, and the result is better every single time, because Claude knows what a complete prompt looks like far better than any formula does. This guide is that paste, how to use it, three worked examples, and what to do when it misbehaves.
Type your request the way you'd say it out loud. Then, before Claude does anything, ask it to rewrite that request as the prompt it would want to receive, with questions in brackets for anything it doesn't know. Answer the brackets in a line each, say go, and send. Claude writes the prompt. You write the answers. The full master prompt is in Part 2.
The master prompt is a short paste that tells Claude to stop, rewrite your rough request as a complete prompt (who it's for, what done looks like, length, format, tone, what to leave out), put a question in brackets wherever it would otherwise guess, and wait for your go. You answer the brackets, and Claude runs the prompt it wrote.
Claude, on any plan, including free. It works in ChatGPT and Gemini too, word for word. Nothing to install and nothing to memorize; the paste does the remembering.
Not because it’s smarter than you. Because it knows exactly what it needs. Every weak answer you’ve ever gotten came from a detail that wasn’t in the prompt: who the thing was for, how long it should be, what to leave out, what tone. You didn’t include those because you didn’t think of them. Claude thinks of them every time, because they’re the things it reaches for first when it starts writing.
So instead of you guessing what to include, you flip it. You hand Claude the rough version and ask: if you were asking another AI to do this, how would you write the prompt? It writes the prompt it wishes it had gotten. It adds the audience, the length, the format. And where it doesn’t know something, the master prompt tells it to ask instead of guess. That last part is the whole trick. Guessing is where answers go wrong. Questions in brackets take the guessing out.
Paste this at the top of a new chat, put your rough request where it says, and send.
Before you do anything, rewrite my request as the prompt you would want to receive. Read what I typed below. Then write the version you would use if you were asking another AI to do this. Include: who the result is for, the goal and what done looks like, the length and format, the tone, what to leave out, and any facts you need from me. Where a detail is missing, put a question in brackets instead of guessing. Show me only the rewritten prompt. Do not do the task yet. Wait for me to answer the questions and say go.
My request: [paste it here]
The quick version from the video. When you don’t want the full paste, type your request as usual and add this one line at the end:
If you were asking another AI to do this, how would you write the prompt? Show me the version you'd use.
The full paste is better because of two things the short line doesn’t say: put questions in brackets instead of guessing, and don’t do the task yet. Use the short one when you’re in a hurry. Use the full one when it matters.
Make it automatic. In Claude, open a Project (they’re on the free plan too), click Set project instructions, and paste this version, which drops the “My request” line and tells Claude to treat every message as the request:
Before you do anything with any message I send, rewrite it as the prompt you would want to receive. Write the version you would use if you were asking another AI to do this. Include: who the result is for, the goal and what done looks like, the length and format, the tone, what to leave out, and any facts you need from me. Where a detail is missing, put a question in brackets instead of guessing. Show me only the rewritten prompt. Do not do the task yet. Wait for me to answer the questions and say go.
Every chat in that project now starts by rewriting whatever you type. In ChatGPT, paste the same text into Customize ChatGPT under custom instructions, or into a Project’s instructions. In Gemini, make a Gem with it. After that you just type rough requests.
Claude hands back a prompt with a few [bracketed questions] in it. This is the part people overthink. Don’t.
- One line per bracket. “For my landlord.” “Short, five sentences.” “Firm but polite.” That’s plenty.
- “Skip” is an answer. If a bracket asks for something you don’t care about, type skip and Claude uses a sensible default.
- Answer in a list, not by editing the prompt. Type “1. my landlord 2. five sentences 3. firm, polite” and then the word go. Claude fills in its own prompt and runs it.
- Say go. That’s the trigger the master prompt is waiting for. Until you say it, Claude keeps holding.
The whole exchange is: your rough request, Claude’s prompt with three or four brackets, your one-line answers, go, the result. Under a minute, and the result reads like you thought about it for ten.
Keep what it writes. The prompt Claude hands back is a finished, reusable prompt. Copy it into a note before you say go. The third time you ask for the same kind of thing (a client email, a caption, a weekly plan), you already have a prompt with brackets in it, and you’re only filling in the blanks. That’s a prompt library that builds itself from your own requests, in your own words.
Each one is the rough request you’d actually type, then the kind of prompt Claude hands back. The brackets are Claude’s questions, and they’re the point.
1. The email you’ve been putting off
Rough request:
write an email to my landlord about the leak under the sink, it's been two weeks
What comes back looks like this:
Write a short email from a tenant to their landlord about a leak under the kitchen sink that was first reported two weeks ago and hasn't been fixed. Audience: the landlord, [first name or "Mr./Ms. Last name"?]. Goal: get a repair scheduled this week and create a written record. Length: five to seven sentences. Tone: polite, firm, not angry. Include: the date it was first reported [what date?], how it was reported [text, call, email?], that it's getting worse [is it? any damage to the cabinet or floor?], and a request for a specific repair date. Leave out: threats, legal language, and apologies. End with a clear ask and a thank-you.
You answer: “1. Mr. Alvarez 2. August 30 3. by text 4. yes, the cabinet floor is soft now. go.” And you get the email you’d have spent twenty minutes writing.
2. The post that has to sound like you
Rough request:
write an instagram caption about my new fall grooming special
What comes back looks like this:
Write an Instagram caption for a small business announcing a fall grooming special. Audience: local dog owners who already follow the account. Goal: get them to book. Length: three short lines plus a call to action, under 60 words. Tone: warm and a little playful, like the owner talking, not an ad. Include: the offer [what is it exactly, and through what date?], the business name [name?], how to book [link in bio, DM, phone?]. Leave out: hashtags in the body (I'll add three at the end), exclamation points on every line, and the word "unleash." Paste one previous caption you liked so I can match the voice [paste?].
Notice the last bracket. It asked for a sample of your voice. You’d never think to include that. Claude always does.
3. The thing you don’t know how to ask for
Rough request:
help me figure out if I should switch my daughter's school
What comes back looks like this:
Act as a thinking partner, not an advisor, for a parent deciding whether to move their daughter to a different school. Goal: help me see the decision clearly, not make it for me. Format: first, four questions back to me, one at a time, about what's driving this [what's the main problem at the current school?], what the alternative is [a specific school, or still looking?], her age and how she feels about it [age? has she said anything?], and what a good outcome looks like a year from now. Then, once I've answered, a one-page summary: what I said matters most, the trade-offs in plain terms, and the two or three things I'd want to find out before deciding. Tone: calm, direct, no reassurance for its own sake. Leave out: generic advice about "every child is different."
That’s a better conversation than “help me figure out” would ever have started. Same you, same Claude, better prompt.
It doesn’t know your facts. The brackets are Claude admitting that. The dates, the names, the price, the thing that happened: those come from you, and the answers are only as good as what you type into the brackets.
It doesn’t replace your judgment. Example three is a thinking partner on purpose. Claude can lay out a decision clearly. Making it is still yours.
It works best with a real task. “Make me money” is a wish. “Give me three ways to add $500 a month to my grooming business” is a task, and Claude turns a task into a prompt worth running. When you’re not sure what to ask for, use example three: ask Claude to be a thinking partner and let its questions find the task.
Open a new chat, paste the master prompt, and put the last thing you asked Claude for under it, the one where the answer was fine but not great. Look at the brackets. Every one of them is a detail you didn't give it last time. Answer them, say go, and compare. Then put the master prompt in a Project so you never paste it again.
Want more like this?
One simple AI win in your inbox every Sunday. No jargon, no overwhelm, unsubscribe whenever you like.
Want more like this?
Free AI guides added regularly. No jargon, no overwhelm.
kellystrattonai.com
